Nkandla ruling by Concourt has put politicians back in their boxes
History teaches us that successful countries – in the sense of being more peaceful and prosperous than others – have fundamental characteristics in common:
- They have constitutions that limit the powers of the executive and administrative arms of government and protect citizens from arbitrary and autocratic government actions.
- Their citizens understand and support constitutional limitations of government power and demand adherence to the rule of law.
- They have independent judiciaries that jealously guard the constitutional and legal rights of citizens against legislative erosion.
South Africa’s past has left its people ill-prepared for dealing with a rights-based society. Fundamental rights, taken for granted in more humane societies, were trampled on with impunity. This heritage leaves us with at least four areas of grave concern:
- A nation that has lived under a biased system is inclined to perpetuate bias in its attempts to redress past wrongs, postponing indefinitely the adoption of a dispensation based on true and impartial justice.
- Those who are charged with formulating, evaluating, approving, implementing and interpreting legislation as well as applying the law do not easily discard their past conditioning, even if they themselves were the victims of injustice.
- The statute books remain filled with legislation that was adopted with perverse intentions, a situation that may take decades to correct.
- We all have to learn to think and live as free independent beings, a capability that is acquired with the utmost difficulty by a previously subjugated people.
South Africa is a nation of great promise and we are convinced that we can find solutions to these problems, but there can be no doubt that this will require dedication, goodwill and, above all, adherence to sound constitutional and legal principles.
During his address to the conference, Justice Pius Langa commented on the role of the courts: “The Constitution vests the judicial authority in the republic in the courts. An order or decision issued by a court is binding on all persons to whom it applies. It is also binding on organs of the state. The power of the court to subject legislation and executive conduct to judicial review is entrenched. The court’s constitutional jurisdiction involves the protection of the rights of individuals, and adjudication on violations.”
The Constitutional Court judgement in the Nkandla case provided a crisp answer to those who might have believed that they were immune from the application of the Constitution and the rule of law:
Has the Nkandla judgement set South Africa on the course we should have been on at the outset? The past 15 years have shown that some of our fears were justified. Events have shown that it is extremely difficult for a nation to overcome an unjust past and that a nation that has “lived under a biased system is inclined to perpetuate bias in its attempts to redress past wrongs”. However, the nation has now had 21 years of experience that shows so clearly that to perpetuate biases in the law is counter-productive. Perhaps there will be a re-assessment post-Nkandla that will lead to equality before the law for all South Africans and the institution of policies that will lead to high economic growth, a rapid decline in unemployment and poverty, and the creation of a free, just and prosperous nation.