High Court Grants R326m Freezing Order in Tembisa Hospital Fraud Case

Posted 21 July 2026 Written by Acts Online
Category Litigation & Regulation

Brought to you by SAnews: In terms of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, No. 121 of 1998 (POCA), the Gauteng Division of the High Court has granted a R326 million asset preservation order targeting individuals implicated in the R2 billion Tembisa Hospital procurement fraud scandal.

The order authorises the National Prosecuting Authority’s (NPA) Asset Forfeiture Unit (AFU) to seize assets belonging to alleged members of the Maumela syndicate. The assets subject to the preservation order include high-end residential properties and luxury vehicles.

This enforcement action follows an extensive forensic investigation and a comprehensive review of Tembisa Hospital’s Basic Accounting System (BAS) by the Specialised Audit Services Unit of the National Treasury. The probe investigated allegations of systemic tender fraud, corruption, and irregular expenditure at the hospital.

What this means for you, your business, or your clients

  • For yourself: No direct individual obligations; legal professionals and forensic auditors should note the increasing reliance on National Treasury BAS data in securing high-value preservation orders under POCA.
  • For your business: Professional firms providing auditing, accounting, or advisory services must ensure strict compliance with reporting obligations under the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, No. 38 of 2001 (FICA), specifically regarding suspicious and unusual transactions (Section 29).
  • For your clients: Corporate clients participating in public sector procurement must implement stringent supply chain risk assessments and independent compliance audits to avoid inadvertent exposure to illicit syndicates and potential asset forfeiture under POCA.

Originally published at https://www.sanews.gov.za/south-africa/criminals-must-be-deprived-ill-gotten-wealth-justice-minister

The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Acts Online. Acts Online accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the article, nor does the information contained herein constitute advice, legal or otherwise.