To facilitate the achievements of strategic, tactical and operational plans aligned to national imperatives and its goals and objectives. It is envisaged that this will be realised through effective and efficient management of national goals and objectives of the following:
| • |
2011 – 2020 United Nations Decade of Action Plan |
| • |
The National Road Safety Strategy |
| • |
National Road Traffic Law Enforcement Strategy and Deployment Model |
| • |
The National 365 Road Safety Framework |
| • |
The National Road Traffic Law Enforcement 24/7 Shift Police. |
2.1 Performance management
| 2.1.1 |
Areas to be considered but not limited to: |
| (a) |
Most reduced road accidents in an authority |
| (b) |
Best performing authority on top six most lethal offences |
| (c) |
Best managed authority relating to supervision, monitoring and record keeping |
| (d) |
Authority compliant with submission of signed off Quarterly Intelligent driven plans and |
| (f) |
Authority with best Road Safety Programs |
| (g) |
Authority with most sustained diverse Communication platform |
| (h) |
Authority compliant with attendance of national committees |
| (i) |
Authority with compliant with submission of daily, monthly and quarterly reports |
| (j) |
deployment and to the NATRAFJOC |
| (k) |
Authority with most effective best practices |
| (l) |
Authority compliant with National Standard Operating Procedures |
| (m) |
Authority compliant with refresher training policy requirements |
| 2.2 |
Evaluation of performance of an authority |
| (a) |
The Corporation is responsible for evaluating the performance of all traffic law enforcement authorities. |
| (b) |
Performance evaluation must be conducted informally on monthly basis with the collation of all traffic law enforcement authorities. |
| (c) |
The traffic law enforcement authority must evaluate its own performance on a quarterly basis by collating all officer performance reports 2.7 Evaluation of performance of the authority |
| 2.4 |
Evaluation of issues influencing performance |
| (a) |
Each traffic law enforcement authority must evaluate all issues that influenced the performance of the authority for the preceding quarter and include such issues in the performance report to be submitted to the Chief of Traffic. |
| (b) |
Issues that negatively influenced performance shall be “interrogated” thoroughly and solutions to these issues must be developed and included in the report. |
| (c) |
Issues that positively influenced performance must be summarised and included in the report as best practise. |
| 2.5 |
Preparation of performance report |
| (a) |
Each traffic law enforcement authority must include all performance data and issues that influenced performance as well as all other information as specified in a performance report. |
| (b) |
The traffic law enforcement authority must submit the report to the Municipal Manager or Provincial Head of Department when completed. |
| 2.4 |
Content and format of performance report |
| (a) |
The performance report must be in a similar format to that of the prescribed forms used for recording data. |
| (b) |
The data must be included in the performance report. |
| (c) |
A report must be created in a similar format to the individual performance data forms, indicating the average performance of an officer at the authority. |
| (d) |
All the performance data as well as issues influencing performance, along with other data required, must be included in the report. |
| 2.5 |
Submission of reports to the Chief of Traffic |
| (a) |
The performance reports must be submitted to the Chief of Traffic for evaluation of authority, provincial and national performance. |
Stamp Duties Act, 1968 (Act 77 of 1968)
